The Political Keg Blog

During Obama's campaign for the white house he had said he would spread the wealth around. Republican politicians and conservative voters called Obama out saying he was a socialist. Obama repeatedly denied this and the main stream liberal media defended Obama all the way to the white house. And now, not even a month into his presidency the socialist acts are quite apparent, and can no longer be denied or ignored.

First of all, this economic stimulus plan that is being bull rushed through congress is the biggest waste of American tax dollars and adds to a current large national debt. During Obama's first address to the nation where he spoke about his "stimulus" plan, he many times brought up the fact of inheriting a national debt from president Bush. Obama, do you not realize that Bush also inherited a national debt. All Obama wants to do is blame others because he has no idea how to solve the problem. Since Obama speaks as though the national debt is so out of control, why is he planning on instantly dumping another trillion dollars onto the debt. This stimulus bill is just another liberal attempt toward socialist ideas, and spending money we don't have. In Obama's stimulus package there is money going to ACORN! A group that has lawsuits against it for voter fraud, and a group that helped Obama get elected. Why are American's tax dollars helping to fund a scamming liberal group? If Obama really wanted to get the country out of a recession and to start trying to lower the national debt, he wouldn't be planning a trillion dollar pig roast.

Obama has made yet another disturbing move toward socialism and complete fraud by wanting to place control of the census in the white house, and have it no longer in control of the Commerce Department. Obama is already trying to get elected in 2012 by controlling the redistricting involved with the census.

You can tell a lot about a person based on the people they associate with and the music they listen to.

What can this tell us about our president? Well, it's easy as black and white to tell what kind of person America's first unconstitutional, non-citizen president is. The APA (American Psychological Association) has an article on violent music and its effect on thoughts and feelings.

Lets take a look at the kind of music our president listens to. We know Barack Hussein Obama listens to some extremely violent, racist, sexist, and explicit music. Barack Hussein Obama is a "self-confessed hip-hop head and Jay-Z fan"

The other day as I sat down for lunch at work, I was watching the news and enjoying my food. I then heard a story of an 8 year old kid who shot his dad twice, and his dad's friend twice. The story is a sad one, but what was even worse is that the woman on the news station went on a rant saying that this is not a story about an 8 year old killing two people but that of America's gun ownership laws. After hearing this statement I became filled with rage and completely lost my appetite. Of course this is a story about a kid killing two people. No gun forced this kid to shoot two people.

This is what is wrong with the liberal view point on gun ownership and gun control laws. They are always blaming the guns and gun companies for people's decisions to use a perfectly safe firearm in the wrong way. Gun companies don't tell someone to commit murder with the gun, it is up to the individual with the gun to be sure they are safe and use the gun in a proper manner.

The liberal view point also seems to think that taking guns away from law abiding citizens will somehow stop all crimes that are committed with a gun. But for some reason liberals can't get it through their brains that disarming Americans is a complete slap in the face to our founding fathers, and that the disarming of law abiding citizens only does one thing, Disarms law abiding citizens. Gun control does absolutely nothing to criminals and those who would actually use a gun to commit a crime. With Barack Obama's gun control policies, he is basically saying law abiding citizens cannot use a gun to defend themselves or their families but instead have to sit back and watch as they get robbed, raped, or murdered.

Barack Hussein Obama and his traveling hoard of extremist liberals want to bail out the auto industry now. What will they think of next? Here's why Hussein's latest push for socialism is a bad idea... besides the fact that it's socialism.

• Hussein campaigned saying he wanted "relief for Main Street."
  
  • How is bailing out US auto makers going to help main street? Any type of relief needs to have a lasting effect, otherwise it is just a very expensive bandage on a mortal wound. Yes, people will lose jobs if the big three go under, but they keep announcing more and more layoffs every year anyways, and have been for a long time. Even if the auto industry is given a large amount of tax payer money, there will still be large layoffs, and the industry will still be just as broke as it is now. Wasting money on a bailout is just putting off the inevitable.
  • Why are the liberals pushing so hard for the bailout? Easy, the bailout should cover their asses with less layoffs from the auto industry over the next few years (before the automakers burn through the bailout money and end up in the same predicament). The money should provide just the right amount of time to "cook the books" on the unemployment rate for Hussein and the rest of the democrats in their bids for reelection in 2010 and 2012. Of course, that is if Hussein doesn't declare himself benevolent dictator for life and do away with elections all together.
    
    
    Read More...

McClatchy Newspapers reports that Barack Hussein Obama, “has declared coercive interrogation methods such as waterboarding unconstitutional and illegal, but will his Justice Department investigate or prosecute Bush administration officials who ordered or condoned such techniques?” Only time will tell how wishy washy this liberal extremist truly is. Will he follow through with everything he said to lure people into voting for him? And in doing so, charge people who took the road they had to in order to protect our country from outside extremists. Or now that his place is secured, will he do what is best for himself and forget about this vague idea of “change.” If he prosecutes people for protecting our country, he is giving every terrorist a free pass by telling them that we might try to stop them, just not very hard. If he doesn't prosecute, then his whole campaign, his whole platform is a complete farce and he will lose support even from his own side.

Does everyone know that Hussein is half white and half black? His mother is white. Yes, his pastor of 20 years is a big time racist who openly hates white people, and yes Hussein denounced his white ancestry and culture. But that doesn't mean that he hates white people... does it? Obviously not, although he denounced his own flesh and blood, his grandmother, he still found time to visit her when it was politically beneficial for him.

Of course the liberal media is ablaze, still, about racism. Is it just me or is it the liberals who are keeping racism alive? They gloat and squeal with delight that a “black man” was elected president of the United States. They don't mention at all that Hussein is just as much white as he is black. So just as much as a black man was elected president, so was a white man. Furthermore, why does the liberal media keep bringing this up? Why does it matter what color his skin is? If the liberals really wanted to rise above racism, they would focus on the promises Hussein made during his campaign, and whether or not he makes good on all his promises, instead of just the fact that a half black man was elected.

After the election, The Daily News Journal from Murfreesboro, TN brings up the fact that “Obama was hanged in effigy from a tree at the University of Kentucky campus...” But no where in the article does it mention the fact that Sen McCain and Gov Palin were hanged in effigy in California. Despite the fact that several news organizations reported on it, the liberal media never ran with it. Apparently it was OK with the liberals to see republicans hanging in effigy from homes on trick-or-treat routes.

Now that the election has come to an end and a candidate has been chosen to take over the White House in January, I thought it would be a good idea to take a look at who was elected as the next president of the United States.

First of all, political news stations have been raving, saying that Barack Hussein Obama ran such a perfect campaign and that is the reason why he won on November 4th. I highly disagree. Barack Hussein Obama has made this year's campaign the most costly campaign for the White House ever. Going back on his word about public financing allowed him to basically buy the presidency.

Now we have a soon to be president who is so willing to spend millions of dollars toward a campaign, so now is there any questions as to what he'd do with all of Americans tax dollars? The country has a large national debt, and the only way out is to save the money, not by putting a tax hiking liberal president into power along with a democratically controlled house and senate.